Question 1
Vantage Data House
Americans' Views on ICE
Overview
Key Findings
High-level takeaways from modeled estimates
Note on Methodology
We estimate a machine learning ensemble that predicts opinion as a function of party, geography, age, sex, education, income, religion, race, and contextual variables. We generate predicted probabilities for detailed demographic cells and post-stratify them to the county, congressional district, state house, and state senate levels using turnout-adjusted population weights before aggregating to the national level. Reported differences (e.g., rural vs. urban) reflect differences in predicted support for those populations as they are composed—including their partisan and demographic makeup—rather than simple unweighted survey averages. As a result, rural–urban differences are not strictly ceteris paribus; they partly reflect differences in partisan composition. For ceteris paribus-style comparisons, we report within-group breakdowns and crosstabs (e.g., rural vs. urban within party).
Survey Questions
Topline Results
Two ICE questions with full response distributions
Demographics
Demographic Breakdown
Explore each question by demographic group
Question 2
ICE investigations
Interactive Explorer
Crosstabs Explorer
Enforcement first, investigations second
Question 1
ICE enforcement
Cross-tabulated estimates by two demographic variables
Question 2
ICE investigations
Cross-tabulated estimates by two demographic variables
Values are weighted poststratified estimates (percent).
Archetypes
Archetypes
View archetype support by question and response category
Geographic
State Ranking
All 51 states ranked with top and bottom tiers highlighted